<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Osteonecrosis and Fosamax &#187; FDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fosamax-legal.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FDA review shows no link between bone treatment and thigh fractures</title>
		<link>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2010/03/23/fda-review-shows-no-link-between-bone-treatment-and-thigh-fractures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2010/03/23/fda-review-shows-no-link-between-bone-treatment-and-thigh-fractures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Walker-Journey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abnormal heartbeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Actonel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atrial fibrillation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atypical subtyrochanteric femur fractures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bisphosphonates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boniva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fosamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leg fractures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoperosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procter and Gamble Co]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reclast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roche Holding AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thigh fractures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fosamax-legal.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says data from an ongoing safety review of oral bisphosphonates, such as Fosamax, prescribed for the treatment of bone loss, do not appear to be related to an increased risk of thigh fractures. However, the agency is telling health care professionals to be aware of a possible risk of [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com">Osteonecrosis and Fosamax</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2010/03/23/fda-review-shows-no-link-between-bone-treatment-and-thigh-fractures/">FDA review shows no link between bone treatment and thigh fractures</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/media/2009/03/tablets.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-104" title="tablets" src="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/media/2009/03/tablets.jpg" alt="tablets" width="120" height="90" /></a>The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm204127.htm">Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</a> says data from an <strong>ongoing safety review</strong> of <strong>oral bisphosphonates</strong>, such as <strong><a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" title="" rel="external">Fosamax</a></strong>, prescribed for the treatment of bone loss, do not appear to be related to an increased risk of <strong>thigh fractures</strong>. However, the agency is telling health care professionals to be aware of a possible risk of <strong>atypical subtrochanteric femur fractures</strong> in patients using bisphosphonates.</p>
<p>The ongoing safety review was initiated in June 2008, following published case reports of this specific type of thigh fracture in patients with <strong><a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/osteoporosis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with osteoporosis">osteoporosis</a></strong> taking bisphosphonates. The agency says it will continue to study this issue along with a team of outside experts, which includes members of the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture Task Force.<span id="more-150"></span></p>
<p>Bisphosphonates include <strong><a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a>’s <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a>, Roche Holding AG’s Boniva, Novartis AG’s Reclast, </strong>and<strong> Procter </strong><strong>and</strong><strong> Gamble Co’s Actonel</strong>.</p>
<p>Bisphosphonates have been available for the treatment of <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/osteoporosis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with osteoporosis">osteoporosis</a> for about 10 years, however this isn’t the first time the medication’s safety has fallen under FDA review. Reuters reported that in 2008, the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62A07Q20100311"><em>New England Journal of Medicine</em></a> suggested the drug may increase users’ risk of a serious <strong>atrial fibrillation</strong>, or <strong>abnormal heartbeat</strong>. After reviewing the claims, the FDA said data didn’t show an overall risk of heart problems.</p>
<p>Bbisphosphonates, however, have been linked to another serious condition called <strong><a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/" title="" rel="external">osteonecrosis</a> of the jaw (<a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/onj/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ONJ">ONJ</a>)</strong>, a painful decaying of the jawbone. <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/merck/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with Merck">Merck</a> faces <strong>lawsuits</strong> involving nearly 900 cases by patients who say <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a> caused their <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/onj/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ONJ">ONJ</a>.</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com">Osteonecrosis and Fosamax</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2010/03/23/fda-review-shows-no-link-between-bone-treatment-and-thigh-fractures/">FDA review shows no link between bone treatment and thigh fractures</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2010/03/23/fda-review-shows-no-link-between-bone-treatment-and-thigh-fractures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/media/2009/03/tablets.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/media/2009/03/tablets.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">tablets</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osteoporosis drugs to undergo FDA safety review</title>
		<link>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2007/10/07/osteoporosis-drugs-to-undergo-fda-safety-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2007/10/07/osteoporosis-drugs-to-undergo-fda-safety-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Thomas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bisphosphonates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boniva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and drug administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fosamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ONJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteonecrosis of the jaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fosamax-legal.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is going to be taking another look at Fosamax and other bone building drugs because they could be causing irregular heartbeats in some patients. 

The FDA safety review of bisphosphonates, a class of drugs often used to increase bone mass in order to treat osteoporosis, was prompted after a [...]<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com">Osteonecrosis and Fosamax</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2007/10/07/osteoporosis-drugs-to-undergo-fda-safety-review/">Osteoporosis drugs to undergo FDA safety review</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is going to be taking another look at <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" title="" rel="external">Fosamax</a> and other bone building drugs because they could be causing irregular heartbeats in some patients. </p>
<p><span id="more-65"></span><br />
The FDA safety review of bisphosphonates, a class of drugs often used to increase bone mass in order to treat <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/osteoporosis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with osteoporosis">osteoporosis</a>, was prompted after a study published last May in the New England Journal of Medicine found that patients taking these drugs had high rates of atrial fibrillation.</p>
<p>Bisphosphonates are used to increase bone mass and reduce fracture risk in patients with <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/osteoporosis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with osteoporosis">osteoporosis</a>. They also are also used to slow bone turnover in patients with a disorder called Paget&#8217;s disease and to treat bone metastases and lower blood calcium in cancer patients. There are currently 8 bisphosphonates approved for use in the US. They are <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a>, Reclast, Boniva, Actonel, Zometa, Aredia, Didronel and Skelid.</p>
<p>Research published in the May 7 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine found that bisphosphonates appeared to increase the risk of irregular heartbeats in some older women. Researchers conducting a review of a 1997 study of postmenopausal women on <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a> found that there appeared to be 50 percent more risk of the serious heart rhythm irregularities in women who took the daily pill than among those who didn&#8217;t take it. About half of the 6,459 women took <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a>, and 47 developed atrial fibrillation, compared to just 31 cases among the other women.</p>
<p>A second study published in the same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine cast doubt on another bisphosphonate, Reclast. In a study of 7,736 postmenopausal women with bone-thinning <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/osteoporosis/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with osteoporosis">osteoporosis</a>, the risk of a serious case of irregular heart rhythm was more than double that in the other patients.</p>
<p>In announcing the bisphosphonate safety review, the FDA said that it was &#8220;unclear how these data on serious atrial fibrillation should be interpreted. Therefore, FDA does not believe that healthcare providers or patients should change either their prescribing practices or their use of bisphosphonates at this time.&#8221; The agency will be seeking additional data on the possible atrial fibrillation risks associated with these drugs, and it expects the safety review of bisphosphonates to take about 12 months.</p>
<p>This is not the first time that the safety of <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a> has been questioned. The drug has been linked to <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/" title="" rel="external">Osteonecrosis</a> of the Jaw (<a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/onj/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ONJ">ONJ</a>), also known as Dead Jaw Syndrome, a condition in which the bone tissue in the jaw fails to heal after minor trauma such as a tooth extraction, causing the bone to be exposed. The exposure can eventually lead to infection and fracture and may require long-term antibiotic therapy or surgery to remove the dying bone tissue. In 2005, the <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/fosamax/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with fosamax">Fosamax</a> label was updated to include warnings about <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/tag/onj/" class="st_tag internal_tag" rel="tag" title="Posts tagged with ONJ">ONJ</a>. </p>
<p>October 2nd, 2007</p>
<p>SOURCE: <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com">Osteonecrosis and Fosamax</a> &rsaquo; <a href="http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2007/10/07/osteoporosis-drugs-to-undergo-fda-safety-review/">Osteoporosis drugs to undergo FDA safety review</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fosamax-legal.com/news/2007/10/07/osteoporosis-drugs-to-undergo-fda-safety-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
